<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Cox- Horizon- Do You Know What Time It Is?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TED Prize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Time Is It?</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-47112</link>
		<dc:creator>TED Prize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Time Is It?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-47112</guid>
		<description>[...] BBC 2 had an episode of its Horizon series titled &#8220;Do You Know What Time It Is?&#8221;. (HT Gia&#8217;s Blog) In this episode, particle physicist (and TED speaker) Brian Cox asks, &#8216;What time is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BBC 2 had an episode of its Horizon series titled &#8220;Do You Know What Time It Is?&#8221;. (HT Gia&#8217;s Blog) In this episode, particle physicist (and TED speaker) Brian Cox asks, &#8216;What time is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TED Prize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Time Is It?</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-47111</link>
		<dc:creator>TED Prize &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Time Is It?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-47111</guid>
		<description>[...] BBC 2 had an episode of its Horizon series titled &#8220;Do You Know What Time It Is?&#8221;. (HT Gia&#8217;s Blog) In this episode, particle physicist (and TED speaker) Brian Cox asks, &#8216;What time is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BBC 2 had an episode of its Horizon series titled &#8220;Do You Know What Time It Is?&#8221;. (HT Gia&#8217;s Blog) In this episode, particle physicist (and TED speaker) Brian Cox asks, &#8216;What time is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46982</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46982</guid>
		<description>If I mistake not, both Sagan and Hawking said they are comfortable with the idea of:
1. An observable universe which is traceable 13.7 billion years back to it&#039;s beginning - the Big Bang. And before and beyond the bang, 
2. An eternal and everlasting universe which was there, is there expanding and will be there one way or the other.
I&#039;d say what they said are both honest and self-sufficient, and very satisfying to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I mistake not, both Sagan and Hawking said they are comfortable with the idea of:<br />
1. An observable universe which is traceable 13.7 billion years back to it&#8217;s beginning &#8211; the Big Bang. And before and beyond the bang,<br />
2. An eternal and everlasting universe which was there, is there expanding and will be there one way or the other.<br />
I&#8217;d say what they said are both honest and self-sufficient, and very satisfying to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46743</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46743</guid>
		<description>A few days ago I saw a commercial for the premiere of &#039;What Time Is It?&#039; airing Sunday, March 1, 9pm/12am on the Science Channel (USA). I&#039;ve seen two of Brian&#039;s other programs aired previously on the Science Channel, and they are among my all-time favorites (permanently saved on my TiVo), so I was really excited when I saw the ad for the new show. I went to the website (science.discovery.com) to look for more info and didn&#039;t find much except the guide listing, so I did further searching and found this site. My initial thought when viewing &#039;What on Earth Is Wrong With Gravity&#039; was that they finally found a good looking scientist to do a show. Ultimately, however, I was most impressed by his charmingly charismatic style. I prefer him over Dr. Iain Stewart, another UK scientist on TV here (&#039;Hot Rocks&#039; and &#039;Earth: The Biography&#039;.) They are both excellent at presenting information, but Dr. Cox&#039;s enthusiasm is intriguing and enjoyable, while Dr. Stewart&#039;s enthusiasm is sometimes overdramatic and distracting. Of course one is physics and the other is geology, so maybe I shouldn&#039;t compare them. When it comes to physics, Dr. Cox is right up there with Dr. Michio Kaku, in terms of worthwhile television. Quite fittingly, the Science Channel is promoting &#039;What Time Is It?&#039; as a part of Dr. Kaku&#039;s branded SciQ Sunday lineup. I&#039;m looking forward to it...and we only had to wait three months from when it aired in Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago I saw a commercial for the premiere of &#8216;What Time Is It?&#8217; airing Sunday, March 1, 9pm/12am on the Science Channel (USA). I&#8217;ve seen two of Brian&#8217;s other programs aired previously on the Science Channel, and they are among my all-time favorites (permanently saved on my TiVo), so I was really excited when I saw the ad for the new show. I went to the website (science.discovery.com) to look for more info and didn&#8217;t find much except the guide listing, so I did further searching and found this site. My initial thought when viewing &#8216;What on Earth Is Wrong With Gravity&#8217; was that they finally found a good looking scientist to do a show. Ultimately, however, I was most impressed by his charmingly charismatic style. I prefer him over Dr. Iain Stewart, another UK scientist on TV here (&#8216;Hot Rocks&#8217; and &#8216;Earth: The Biography&#8217;.) They are both excellent at presenting information, but Dr. Cox&#8217;s enthusiasm is intriguing and enjoyable, while Dr. Stewart&#8217;s enthusiasm is sometimes overdramatic and distracting. Of course one is physics and the other is geology, so maybe I shouldn&#8217;t compare them. When it comes to physics, Dr. Cox is right up there with Dr. Michio Kaku, in terms of worthwhile television. Quite fittingly, the Science Channel is promoting &#8216;What Time Is It?&#8217; as a part of Dr. Kaku&#8217;s branded SciQ Sunday lineup. I&#8217;m looking forward to it&#8230;and we only had to wait three months from when it aired in Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy M</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46729</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46729</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andy, I&#039;ll look for it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andy, I&#8217;ll look for it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy H</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46725</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46725</guid>
		<description>Guy M, the whole thing is available on youtube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy M, the whole thing is available on youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy M</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46723</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46723</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I missed Brian&#039;s program on Time, which is a real shame as I find the subject fascinating. However, I did catch this weeks program on attaining nuclear fusion and his previous program about the LHC. Both were fascinating programs, presented with Brian&#039;s unique charm and enthusiasm for the subject.

He has an almost boyish love for what he does, that is infectious and endears the subject matter to the viewer. I&#039;m looking forward to his next program...

By the way, if anyone knows where I can still view &quot;Do You Know What Time It Is&quot;, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I missed Brian&#8217;s program on Time, which is a real shame as I find the subject fascinating. However, I did catch this weeks program on attaining nuclear fusion and his previous program about the LHC. Both were fascinating programs, presented with Brian&#8217;s unique charm and enthusiasm for the subject.</p>
<p>He has an almost boyish love for what he does, that is infectious and endears the subject matter to the viewer. I&#8217;m looking forward to his next program&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, if anyone knows where I can still view &#8220;Do You Know What Time It Is&#8221;, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46719</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46719</guid>
		<description>Love all of his films that he makes with the bbc so interesting and i learn a great deal.

 THANK YOU :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love all of his films that he makes with the bbc so interesting and i learn a great deal.</p>
<p> THANK YOU :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Barnett@hotmail.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Barnett@hotmail.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46707</guid>
		<description>This programme had me totally enchanted. I am a bank manager and power lifter but Brian makes complete sense (as in he simplifies it for me). I love physics but am very far behind as regards string theory and quantom physics.Excellent programme, I have though now come up with many new reasons when arriving late at work, although the boss looks baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This programme had me totally enchanted. I am a bank manager and power lifter but Brian makes complete sense (as in he simplifies it for me). I love physics but am very far behind as regards string theory and quantom physics.Excellent programme, I have though now come up with many new reasons when arriving late at work, although the boss looks baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJowett</title>
		<link>http://www.giagia.co.uk/2008/12/02/brian-cox-horizon-do-you-know-what-time-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-46699</link>
		<dc:creator>SJowett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giagia.co.uk/?p=555#comment-46699</guid>
		<description>Einstein presents gravity as all powerful, sighting it as the force that distorts time, so they contend, the mass of the Sun is the reason time is slowed as any object or energy passes close to its surface, when the reason has nothing to do with mass or gravity at all. Time is the energetic medium of energy interaction, the more energy that is extracted from the virtual energy manifold, or time field, into the physical or observable universe, the less energy exists in the local area of time, from which the extraction has taken place, the Sun extracts vast, vast amounts of time energy, this slows time within this interactive environment, and so slows light as it passes through this localised time drain. 

I personally do not believe, time, travels at the speed of light, as the speed of light can be slowed through transparent mediums, or when travelling through localised areas, where the conversion of time energy is transduced into electromagnetic energy, at these locations light passes through these localised areas of transduction, and is slowed due to the reduction of available time energy, this means two things, firstly light is not a constant, and secondly, light does not create the motion through time of mass, it can however complete the circle, sending its information back into the record within the active time field.

So charge is the continuously active entity, and charge would be far more suited to the task of time circulation, charge performs the processes of energy transduction between the time manifold and three-dimensional space.

Charge changes time, not light, charge is the active, energetic entity, not light, light is passive, charge is practical, charge gives power and life to the universe, light simply illuminates its actions, while simultaneously light is being, itself, generated from the active charge.

Charge is the underlying sustaining and activating physical source, upon manifestation, of every plasma, and as the universe is 99.999% plasma, charge is the real connection to the function and passage of time.

So the real force of time is the electromagnetic charge, this holds the memory of creation, therefore this has to hold the time motion of mass, it is the record keeper, it is the outpouring force driving this form of manifest creation, it is the force of life itself, it is the force within every atom, it is the key to understanding the energy circulation of the open time, to manifold, mutual exchange, within this open energy system of our physical universe.

The form of time is an ocean, the understanding of this ocean can be seen through the idea of the Dirac sea.

The origins of the Dirac sea lie in the energy spectrum of the Dirac equation, extension of the Schrodinger equation, that Dirac had formulated in 1928.

For each quantum state possessing a positive energy E, there is a corresponding state with energy -E.(negative E)

A positive-energy electron would be able to shed energy by continuously emitting photons, a process that could continue without limit as the electron descends into lower and lower energy states, this has been demonstrated experimentally to be true, further demonstrating the open energy exchange of the manifold.

The existence of the Dirac sea holds an infinite negative electric charge filling every Quibit of three dimensional space, the perceived ‘bare vacuum’ must have an infinite positive charge density which is exactly cancelled by the Dirac sea. Since the absolute energy density is unobservable, only the changes in the energy density can be observed, further a sea of infinite extent can accept new particles even if it is filled. This sea of infinite negative electric charge is the time ocean, to master the understanding of the dirac sea free of Einsteinian confusion, will lay bare the form and function of time.

An example:

A Star is a vast dipole, which extracts transduced electromagnetic energy from the time manifold (virtual into observable), and pours it out in all directions at the speed of light, without ceasing, this means a star pours out time-polarised electromagnetic waves looping into the Sun from the outside, and travelling inward, this applies an electromagnetic charge to the gas (ionising the hydrogen), generating a vast plasma ball emitting photons (light spectrum) and heat, and radiations, the dipole continues in a circulation as the longitudinally polarised electromagnetic wave, or photon, discharges into three dimensional space.
Plasmas vary according to temperature and density, and have characteristics that scale over many orders of magnitude, this means to create a star, the density of the ionisation of the hydrogen would be enormous, above 10³³ charged particles per metered cubed. This range of ionisation density explains why for example Jupiter remains as a gas ball, as opposed to a blinding plasma ball of electroluminescence.

The visible Universe is 99.999% plasma. The Sun is almost 100% plasma, as are all stars. Plasma makes up nearly 100% of the interplanetary, interstellar and intergalactic medium.

Electroluminescence of the plasma, by emitting photons, both illuminates the universe, and in addition to the underlying ionised galaxy bubble, connects three-dimensional space to the time manifold, manifesting relativistic time, recorded within the virtual electromagnetic information field within the manifold, making this creation a time path based reality, a multi layered active vacuum information circulation, between the manifold and physical reality.

This means each atom of creation is independently held within time, each moment of time is a multiple connection, it is the manifestation of all dimensional planes working in harmony, as all realities are manifest instant by instant; without this constant materialization of reality, nothing would exist.

Maxwell&#039;s electrodynamics in their original quaternion form must be re-established in full, within the science of physics, abandoning any revisions, which constrain and restrict the true understanding of electrodynamics, perpetrated, so violating our perception of the truth, by reprehensible individuals.

Maxwell’s electrodynamics, when applied to moving bodies, a state apparent for all mass, leads to asymmetries (a relation between two things in which the first has a relation to the second, but the second cannot have the same relation to the first).

This is clearly shown with the function of a dynamo.

Consider first, if the magnet is in motion and the conductor at rest, the magnet transduces the electromagnetic field it emits, into an electric field, with a certain definite energy, producing a current at the places where parts of the conductor are situated.

But if you reverse the situation and the magnet is stationary, and the conductor in motion, no electric field is generated, so demonstrating asymmetry.

This asymmetric principle is important within the physical universe, to allow the principle of a continuous self-creating cosmology, achieved through scalar fields (examples of scalar fields are, temperature distribution throughout space, or the air pressure of our atmosphere.)

The set of all scalar fields on a manifold forms a commutative ring (all scalar field commutative rings are automatically two sided, demonstrating a circulation of information between the active manifold and the manifest physical universe, mass itself is a manifestation of energy (knowledge)). Complex scalar fields represent the variable interactive parameters of charged particles.

Tensor fields (a field existing independently of latitude and longitude, beyond physical constraints), tensor fields defined over a manifold, which define a tensor at every point of the manifold independent of co-ordinates. Tensor fields allow none linear communication, between physical to physical, physical to virtual, virtual to physical, and presumably between virtual to virtual communications. So in combination scalar and tensor fields, generate continuous self creation, which is the expansion of knowledge, being the structure of all things, a single emanating source, the thought, and the memory of existence.

To further understand the existence of the manifold, consider movement, the movement within every atom, a perpetual orbit of interaction, the endless charge pouring from every dipole in the universe, the constant flow of time independently conveying every atom into the next instant of existence, the organic nature of reality cooperating in a harmony of interactive, transmuting, dynamic truth.

Consider what powers this movement, what generates these energies, what manifests this reality instant to instant, an open system of poetic elegance, open to what? Open to a underlying energy exchange, a manifold, the ‘A’ field, the ether, whatever you wish to call it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein presents gravity as all powerful, sighting it as the force that distorts time, so they contend, the mass of the Sun is the reason time is slowed as any object or energy passes close to its surface, when the reason has nothing to do with mass or gravity at all. Time is the energetic medium of energy interaction, the more energy that is extracted from the virtual energy manifold, or time field, into the physical or observable universe, the less energy exists in the local area of time, from which the extraction has taken place, the Sun extracts vast, vast amounts of time energy, this slows time within this interactive environment, and so slows light as it passes through this localised time drain. </p>
<p>I personally do not believe, time, travels at the speed of light, as the speed of light can be slowed through transparent mediums, or when travelling through localised areas, where the conversion of time energy is transduced into electromagnetic energy, at these locations light passes through these localised areas of transduction, and is slowed due to the reduction of available time energy, this means two things, firstly light is not a constant, and secondly, light does not create the motion through time of mass, it can however complete the circle, sending its information back into the record within the active time field.</p>
<p>So charge is the continuously active entity, and charge would be far more suited to the task of time circulation, charge performs the processes of energy transduction between the time manifold and three-dimensional space.</p>
<p>Charge changes time, not light, charge is the active, energetic entity, not light, light is passive, charge is practical, charge gives power and life to the universe, light simply illuminates its actions, while simultaneously light is being, itself, generated from the active charge.</p>
<p>Charge is the underlying sustaining and activating physical source, upon manifestation, of every plasma, and as the universe is 99.999% plasma, charge is the real connection to the function and passage of time.</p>
<p>So the real force of time is the electromagnetic charge, this holds the memory of creation, therefore this has to hold the time motion of mass, it is the record keeper, it is the outpouring force driving this form of manifest creation, it is the force of life itself, it is the force within every atom, it is the key to understanding the energy circulation of the open time, to manifold, mutual exchange, within this open energy system of our physical universe.</p>
<p>The form of time is an ocean, the understanding of this ocean can be seen through the idea of the Dirac sea.</p>
<p>The origins of the Dirac sea lie in the energy spectrum of the Dirac equation, extension of the Schrodinger equation, that Dirac had formulated in 1928.</p>
<p>For each quantum state possessing a positive energy E, there is a corresponding state with energy -E.(negative E)</p>
<p>A positive-energy electron would be able to shed energy by continuously emitting photons, a process that could continue without limit as the electron descends into lower and lower energy states, this has been demonstrated experimentally to be true, further demonstrating the open energy exchange of the manifold.</p>
<p>The existence of the Dirac sea holds an infinite negative electric charge filling every Quibit of three dimensional space, the perceived ‘bare vacuum’ must have an infinite positive charge density which is exactly cancelled by the Dirac sea. Since the absolute energy density is unobservable, only the changes in the energy density can be observed, further a sea of infinite extent can accept new particles even if it is filled. This sea of infinite negative electric charge is the time ocean, to master the understanding of the dirac sea free of Einsteinian confusion, will lay bare the form and function of time.</p>
<p>An example:</p>
<p>A Star is a vast dipole, which extracts transduced electromagnetic energy from the time manifold (virtual into observable), and pours it out in all directions at the speed of light, without ceasing, this means a star pours out time-polarised electromagnetic waves looping into the Sun from the outside, and travelling inward, this applies an electromagnetic charge to the gas (ionising the hydrogen), generating a vast plasma ball emitting photons (light spectrum) and heat, and radiations, the dipole continues in a circulation as the longitudinally polarised electromagnetic wave, or photon, discharges into three dimensional space.<br />
Plasmas vary according to temperature and density, and have characteristics that scale over many orders of magnitude, this means to create a star, the density of the ionisation of the hydrogen would be enormous, above 10³³ charged particles per metered cubed. This range of ionisation density explains why for example Jupiter remains as a gas ball, as opposed to a blinding plasma ball of electroluminescence.</p>
<p>The visible Universe is 99.999% plasma. The Sun is almost 100% plasma, as are all stars. Plasma makes up nearly 100% of the interplanetary, interstellar and intergalactic medium.</p>
<p>Electroluminescence of the plasma, by emitting photons, both illuminates the universe, and in addition to the underlying ionised galaxy bubble, connects three-dimensional space to the time manifold, manifesting relativistic time, recorded within the virtual electromagnetic information field within the manifold, making this creation a time path based reality, a multi layered active vacuum information circulation, between the manifold and physical reality.</p>
<p>This means each atom of creation is independently held within time, each moment of time is a multiple connection, it is the manifestation of all dimensional planes working in harmony, as all realities are manifest instant by instant; without this constant materialization of reality, nothing would exist.</p>
<p>Maxwell&#8217;s electrodynamics in their original quaternion form must be re-established in full, within the science of physics, abandoning any revisions, which constrain and restrict the true understanding of electrodynamics, perpetrated, so violating our perception of the truth, by reprehensible individuals.</p>
<p>Maxwell’s electrodynamics, when applied to moving bodies, a state apparent for all mass, leads to asymmetries (a relation between two things in which the first has a relation to the second, but the second cannot have the same relation to the first).</p>
<p>This is clearly shown with the function of a dynamo.</p>
<p>Consider first, if the magnet is in motion and the conductor at rest, the magnet transduces the electromagnetic field it emits, into an electric field, with a certain definite energy, producing a current at the places where parts of the conductor are situated.</p>
<p>But if you reverse the situation and the magnet is stationary, and the conductor in motion, no electric field is generated, so demonstrating asymmetry.</p>
<p>This asymmetric principle is important within the physical universe, to allow the principle of a continuous self-creating cosmology, achieved through scalar fields (examples of scalar fields are, temperature distribution throughout space, or the air pressure of our atmosphere.)</p>
<p>The set of all scalar fields on a manifold forms a commutative ring (all scalar field commutative rings are automatically two sided, demonstrating a circulation of information between the active manifold and the manifest physical universe, mass itself is a manifestation of energy (knowledge)). Complex scalar fields represent the variable interactive parameters of charged particles.</p>
<p>Tensor fields (a field existing independently of latitude and longitude, beyond physical constraints), tensor fields defined over a manifold, which define a tensor at every point of the manifold independent of co-ordinates. Tensor fields allow none linear communication, between physical to physical, physical to virtual, virtual to physical, and presumably between virtual to virtual communications. So in combination scalar and tensor fields, generate continuous self creation, which is the expansion of knowledge, being the structure of all things, a single emanating source, the thought, and the memory of existence.</p>
<p>To further understand the existence of the manifold, consider movement, the movement within every atom, a perpetual orbit of interaction, the endless charge pouring from every dipole in the universe, the constant flow of time independently conveying every atom into the next instant of existence, the organic nature of reality cooperating in a harmony of interactive, transmuting, dynamic truth.</p>
<p>Consider what powers this movement, what generates these energies, what manifests this reality instant to instant, an open system of poetic elegance, open to what? Open to a underlying energy exchange, a manifold, the ‘A’ field, the ether, whatever you wish to call it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

